What Happens to a Criminal Case When the Alleged Victim Is in Jail or Facing Charges in Arizona?
If you are facing criminal charges and learn that the person accusing you has been arrested, is sitting in jail, or is now facing criminal charges of their own, you may have an immediate question:
Does this mean my case will be dismissed?
Not necessarily.
An alleged victim's arrest, incarceration, or pending criminal case does not automatically make the charges against you disappear. In Arizona, criminal charges are prosecuted by the State—not by the alleged victim. A prosecutor may sometimes move forward even when an alleged victim does not want the case prosecuted, does not appear voluntarily, or has legal problems of their own.
But that does not mean these developments are irrelevant.
Changes in an alleged victim's circumstances can affect witness availability, credibility, impeachment, the prosecutor's assessment of the case, and ultimately the defense strategy. And when those developments occur, an experienced criminal defense attorney should be looking at how they fit into the larger evidentiary picture.
Here is what defendants in Tucson and Pima County should understand.
The Alleged Victim Does Not Decide Whether Criminal Charges Are Dismissed
One of the most common misconceptions in criminal cases is that the alleged victim is the person "pressing charges."
In reality, once criminal charges have been filed, the prosecutor generally controls the prosecution. In a Tucson City Court case, that may be the Tucson City Prosecutor's Office. In other Pima County misdemeanor and felony cases, the prosecuting agency will depend on the jurisdiction and charges involved.
That means an alleged victim usually cannot simply call the prosecutor and demand that the charges be "dropped."
The reverse is also important.
An alleged victim's arrest or incarceration does not automatically require the prosecutor to dismiss your case.
Instead, the important question becomes:
What admissible evidence does the State still have, and can the prosecutor prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt?
That is the question a criminal defense lawyer should be evaluating.
What If the Alleged Victim Is in the Pima County Jail?
If an important witness is being held in the Pima County Adult Detention Complex, that person does not suddenly become unavailable simply because they are incarcerated.
There may be procedures available to secure the attendance of an incarcerated witness at a hearing or trial. Prosecutors may also seek continuances or take other steps to obtain testimony when necessary.
For that reason, a defense strategy should never be based simply on hoping that an alleged victim will remain in jail, disappear, refuse to cooperate, or fail to appear.
But incarceration can still matter.
For example, the prosecutor may have to consider:
How important is this witness to proving the case?
Is there independent evidence corroborating the accusation?
Has the witness made inconsistent statements?
Are there admissible credibility issues?
Does the witness have pending criminal charges that create potential bias or motive issues?
Is the witness likely to remain locally available?
Is the witness facing a sentence that could result in transfer to state custody?
Those questions do not automatically produce a dismissal. They are pieces of the larger strategic picture.
What If the Alleged Victim Is Sent to Prison?
The analysis can become more complicated if an alleged victim is convicted in another case and transferred from the Pima County Jail to the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry.
Again, imprisonment does not necessarily prevent someone from testifying.
But from a practical standpoint, the prosecutor still has to evaluate the strength of the case and the witnesses necessary to prove it.
A witness's location is only one factor.
The more important issue is often what the State's case looks like without relying entirely on that person's accusation.
Suppose the prosecution's case includes surveillance video, independent eyewitnesses, admissions by the defendant, physical evidence, photographs, body-worn camera footage, text messages, or 911 recordings. The prosecutor may believe the case remains strong despite complications involving the alleged victim.
A very different situation may exist when the prosecution depends almost entirely on one person's account and substantial questions arise about that person's availability, credibility, or prior statements.
That is why criminal defense cases have to be evaluated individually.
Does It Matter That the Alleged Victim Is Facing Criminal Charges?
Potentially—but this issue is frequently misunderstood.
The fact that someone has been accused of a crime does not automatically establish that the person is dishonest. It also does not mean a defense attorney can simply tell a jury that the alleged victim has been arrested and argue, "Therefore, you shouldn't believe this person."
Arizona's Rules of Evidence govern what information can be admitted at trial.
However, another criminal case involving a prosecution witness can sometimes raise legitimate issues that deserve investigation.
For example, depending on the circumstances, a defense attorney may need to examine whether a witness has a potential motive, bias, interest, or expectation that could affect his or her testimony.
Imagine that an important prosecution witness is simultaneously facing serious criminal charges. The defense may want to know whether there have been discussions concerning that person's case, whether the witness expects favorable consideration, or whether other circumstances could create a motive to cooperate with law enforcement.
Prior criminal convictions can also raise separate evidentiary questions regarding impeachment, depending upon the conviction and applicable rules.
The key is not simply that a witness has "a record."
The important question is whether there is legally admissible information that affects the jury's ability to evaluate the witness's credibility, bias, motive, or testimony.
Independent Evidence Can Become Critical
This is one reason criminal defense attorneys should not simply read the police report and wait for trial.
Consider a case in which surveillance footage may have captured some or all of the incident.
That video could be extremely important regardless of what ultimately happens with the alleged victim.
Maybe it corroborates the accusation.
Maybe it contradicts it.
Maybe it shows only part of what happened.
Maybe it establishes a timeline inconsistent with a witness's statement.
Or perhaps it reveals something neither side expected.
The defense cannot intelligently evaluate those possibilities without obtaining and reviewing the evidence.
Depending upon the case, other important evidence may include:
Police body-worn camera footage;
911 calls;
Dispatch or CAD records;
Photographs;
Text messages and social media communications;
Medical records;
Security or surveillance video;
Statements from independent witnesses;
Prior statements made by the alleged victim; and
Physical or forensic evidence.
A good defense strategy is built around the evidence—not around hoping that a witness disappears.
Can the Prosecutor Continue the Case Without the Alleged Victim?
Sometimes.
There is no universal rule that says, "No victim means no case."
Whether the State can successfully prosecute a case without live testimony from a particular witness depends heavily on the nature of the charge and the available admissible evidence.
This distinction matters.
There may be a difference between having enough evidence to file a criminal charge and having enough admissible, persuasive evidence to convince a jury of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
A defense attorney should continually evaluate that distinction as a case progresses.
Sometimes evidence obtained during the case makes the prosecution stronger.
Other times, the opposite happens.
Surveillance footage may contradict the original report. Witnesses may give inconsistent accounts. Evidence expected to exist may never materialize. Additional investigation may reveal problems with the government's theory.
Criminal cases are not static. The evidentiary picture can change substantially between the date of an arrest and the date of trial.
Can My Attorney Ask the Prosecutor to Dismiss the Case?
Yes.
But there is an important difference between simply asking for a dismissal and developing a persuasive reason why the prosecutor should dismiss.
An effective dismissal request may involve identifying weaknesses in the evidence, inconsistencies among witnesses, evidentiary problems, missing corroboration, legal defenses, or other circumstances that make continued prosecution inappropriate.
Timing can matter as well.
Sometimes the defense needs additional evidence before it can meaningfully present its position. If important surveillance footage has been requested but has not yet been produced, for example, it may make sense to obtain and review that evidence before making major strategic decisions.
That can be frustrating for defendants who understandably want the case over as quickly as possible.
But "fast" and "best" are not always the same thing in criminal defense.
Sometimes a continuance gives the defense time to obtain evidence, investigate witnesses, litigate disclosure issues, or allow circumstances affecting the prosecution's case to develop.
The goal should not simply be to finish the case.
The goal should be to obtain the best result reasonably available under the circumstances.
What If the Prosecutor Refuses to Dismiss?
Then the defense has another decision to make.
A defense lawyer's job is not simply to ask the prosecutor for a dismissal and accept whatever answer comes back.
If the State will not dismiss a case that should be contested, the defense should evaluate the available motions, defenses, evidentiary issues, plea options, and risks and benefits of trial.
In an appropriate case, that means preparing to try it.
Trial preparation may include interviewing witnesses, reviewing recordings, investigating inconsistencies, preparing cross-examination, litigating evidentiary issues, filing motions, obtaining records, and forcing the State to prove every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.
The fact that a case has not been dismissed yet does not necessarily tell you how that case will ultimately end.
Why Patience Can Be Part of Criminal Defense Strategy
When you are charged with a crime, every court date can feel like another delay.
Clients often understandably ask:
Why can't we just get this dismissed now?
Sometimes the answer is that the defense is still waiting for evidence that could materially change the case.
Criminal defense involves making decisions with incomplete information. Police reports may be available before surveillance footage. Body-camera video may arrive later. Lab results can take time. Witness circumstances can change. Additional criminal cases involving witnesses may progress independently.
Moving too quickly before reviewing important evidence can mean making decisions without knowing the complete picture.
A continuance is not automatically good or bad. The question is what the additional time accomplishes.
If additional time allows the defense to obtain critical evidence or improve its ability to challenge the State's case, patience may be part of the strategy rather than a sign that nothing is happening.
Every Criminal Case Depends on Its Evidence
Learning that the person accusing you has been arrested, jailed, or charged with felonies may seem like a major development.
It can be.
But it does not automatically make your criminal case disappear.
The better questions are:
What does this development mean for the evidence?
What does it mean for the witness's availability or credibility?
What evidence exists independently of that witness?
And can the State still prove every element of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt?
Those are the questions that matter when evaluating whether to seek a dismissal, negotiate a resolution, litigate an issue, or prepare for trial.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will my charges be dismissed if the alleged victim is in jail?
Not automatically. Arizona criminal charges are prosecuted by the government, and an alleged victim's incarceration does not by itself require dismissal. However, witness availability, credibility, and the strength of the remaining evidence may affect the prosecution and defense strategy.
Can someone testify against me while they are in jail?
Potentially, yes. Incarceration does not necessarily prevent a witness from testifying in a criminal case.
What happens if the alleged victim doesn't want to prosecute?
The alleged victim generally does not have unilateral authority to dismiss criminal charges. The prosecutor determines whether the State will continue the prosecution.
Can an alleged victim's criminal charges be used against them at trial?
Not automatically. The Arizona Rules of Evidence control what information may be admitted. Depending on the circumstances, however, a witness's criminal history, pending case, potential bias, motive, or expectation of favorable treatment may present issues that a defense attorney should investigate.
What happens if the alleged victim doesn't appear for trial?
It depends on the case. The prosecutor may attempt to secure the witness's attendance, request additional time, proceed using other admissible evidence when legally permitted, or reconsider the prosecution. The consequences depend on the charges, evidence, and circumstances.
Facing Criminal Charges in Tucson or Pima County?
If you are facing criminal charges in Tucson or Pima County and something has changed involving the person accusing you, that development deserves careful evaluation—but it should not be considered in isolation.
At AJB Law Firm, criminal defense attorney Amanda Bynum represents people accused of criminal offenses in Tucson and throughout Pima County. A defense strategy should examine not only what was written in the original police report, but also the evidence developed afterward, the witnesses the State will actually rely upon, potential credibility issues, and what the prosecution can ultimately prove in court.
If you have been charged with a crime and want to understand your options, contact AJB Law Firm to schedule a consultation.
This article provides general information about Arizona criminal cases and is not legal advice. Every case is different, and past results do not guarantee a particular outcome.
Related Arizona Criminal Defense Articles
Learn more about how witness testimony, video evidence, and corroboration can affect a criminal case in Arizona.
